CHAPTER SIX:  ABUSE OF PROCESS BY THE BOARD.  Why should you care?

We feel threatened by this craziness for lots of reasons.  If the Board can get away with this, what can't it get away with?  If one person (the Board president (aided and abetted by a compliant co-director and another co-director who doesn't feel engaged in the Board's activities) has this much unbridled power, where does the misery end for the rest of us?  Is this step one in an attack on our 18 pound dog as a substitute for attacking me since the dog can't fight back? Are we going to be forced to choose between our condo home and our dog? Isn't this a "dog friendly" condo and doesn't that mean there is tolerance for dogs who accidentally screw up, especially really cute ones like mine, who is adored by everyone who meets her in a safe environment?  I mean, aren't the dog lovers out there infuriated by a non-event like this one causing the Board President to issue fines without complaints just to harass us?

On the same day that David B. called the police to report the dog "bite" (22 days after it happened) he also threatened us by email in a manner that was technically a felony (extortion) punishable by at least one year in jail. On the same day, David B. filed an actual complaint about the bite with the Board, which the Board has acknowledged is the first time such a complaint was filed. David has every right to do what he did, except the extortion part, but we cannot understand why he made this 180 degree turn.  We have our suspicions, though, and they are not pretty. We start our resistance campaign to the Board's unlawful actions and harassment and suddenly, out of the blue, things change.  Hmmm....

We don't actually care much about what David B. did after he gave us his written statement that the event was resolved and he agreed it was an accident. The "bite" is history and we would be surprised if anyone takes his change of heart seriously.  Except our Board of course.  They are taking it as Gospel and have claimed that this change of tune by David B. somehow excuses their lying and fraud presented so clearly in the January 16th letter they wrote.  Wow; if do-overs like this were permitted by offenders, generally, wouldn't the jails be empty?  How stupid do they think we all are?

Nothing occurring after the Board's issuance of its fraudulent fine assessment makes one whit of difference to us. The Board lied in that January 16th letter (seven times by our count) and nothing happening after that date changes that fact. The letter is pure harassment implementing yet another round of trouble for me as part of David Rasmussen's years long vendetta against me.  The fine assessment based on a complaint that did not exist has nothing to do with maintaining order at the POR. David Bagley and I had fully resolved all open issues before the letter was even written and had agreed the event was an accident.  Why did the Board turning this excellent result into a harassment campaign against my family?  And what is David Rasmussen's basis for blaming me for all this trouble?  If he had been truthful in his actions and not vindictive, nothing would be going on at all pertaining to the events of the late evening of January 8, 2015.  If I don't stand up for myself, who will? 

Oops.  I forgot to tell you why you should care. See Chapter 7.